CSM Forum Banner

Prioritization : MoSCow

Exclusive forum for iZenBirdge PMI-ACP® clients
brijesh.shah
Participant
Participant
Posts: 57
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 8:24 am

Prioritization : MoSCow

Postby brijesh.shah Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:42 am

MOSCOW
- Must have
- should have
-could have
-won't have.

As per the video on Saket Video, Could have is for nice to have future.
However, As per Mike griffiths book won't have is for nice to have future which will implement later. As per book could have is for the feature for which alternate solution is available but its not easy for user.

Can you help me to understand this gap ?
seema.sonkiya
Expert
Expert
Posts: 1810
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 11:57 am

Re: Prioritization : MoSCow

Postby seema.sonkiya Wed Dec 14, 2016 12:47 pm

Could have - Nice to have and selected in the backlog.

Won't Have - the main difference is that we did not have selected these features in the backlog.

Return to “PMI-ACP® Queries and Tips”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest